<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of managers : connectors headed up by CCOs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duperrin.com/english/2007/07/30/the-future-of-managers-connectors-leaded-headed-up-by-ccos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2007/07/30/the-future-of-managers-connectors-leaded-headed-up-by-ccos/</link>
	<description>The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertrand DUPERRIN</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2007/07/30/the-future-of-managers-connectors-leaded-headed-up-by-ccos/comment-page-1/#comment-24451</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertrand DUPERRIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 07:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/2007/07/30/the-future-of-managers-connectors-leaded-headed-up-by-ccos/#comment-24451</guid>
		<description>I think we now have the proof that the bis issue about E2.0 adoption is to find someone who want to make it and provide people with the right tools.

It has to do with IT, with HR, with managements...the point is some rules must change and the more efficient way to do so is to have somebody who can take care of all those aspects...a transverse CxO in fact.

Not someone who rule but someone who sets guidelines and provide people with what is needed (social software, right to do things differently.....).

I don&#039;t like the name of Chief Collaboration Officer...why not a Chief Participation Officer since participation is, according to me, key in the new way people will interact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we now have the proof that the bis issue about E2.0 adoption is to find someone who want to make it and provide people with the right tools.</p>
<p>It has to do with IT, with HR, with managements&#8230;the point is some rules must change and the more efficient way to do so is to have somebody who can take care of all those aspects&#8230;a transverse CxO in fact.</p>
<p>Not someone who rule but someone who sets guidelines and provide people with what is needed (social software, right to do things differently&#8230;..).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the name of Chief Collaboration Officer&#8230;why not a Chief Participation Officer since participation is, according to me, key in the new way people will interact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Koser</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2007/07/30/the-future-of-managers-connectors-leaded-headed-up-by-ccos/comment-page-1/#comment-24436</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Koser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/2007/07/30/the-future-of-managers-connectors-leaded-headed-up-by-ccos/#comment-24436</guid>
		<description>Bertrand, excuse me but I would prefer to call this CCO function a Chief Collaboration Officer - with the job description and the tasks you describe &quot;ceteris paribus&quot;.

Yet, more importantly I am in doubt whether CCOs can really &quot;build the appropriate organizational pattern[s] and provide appropriate tools&quot;, ie. whether introducing a new CxO job will suffice.

While we do need people who do connect, facilitate, support and supply the tools - they, just like us, won&#039;t know the necessary patterns, methods and tools in advance ... this new guy or gal alone won&#039;t help - we need more fundamental changes (in management, in the way we collaborate etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bertrand, excuse me but I would prefer to call this CCO function a Chief Collaboration Officer &#8211; with the job description and the tasks you describe &#8220;ceteris paribus&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yet, more importantly I am in doubt whether CCOs can really &#8220;build the appropriate organizational pattern[s] and provide appropriate tools&#8221;, ie. whether introducing a new CxO job will suffice.</p>
<p>While we do need people who do connect, facilitate, support and supply the tools &#8211; they, just like us, won&#8217;t know the necessary patterns, methods and tools in advance &#8230; this new guy or gal alone won&#8217;t help &#8211; we need more fundamental changes (in management, in the way we collaborate etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

