<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools won&#8217;t seduce digital natives. Culture will.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/04/16/tools-wont-seduce-digital-natives-culture-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/04/16/tools-wont-seduce-digital-natives-culture-will/</link>
	<description>The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Koser</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/04/16/tools-wont-seduce-digital-natives-culture-will/comment-page-1/#comment-43767</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Koser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=474#comment-43767</guid>
		<description>Bertrand, this is so true - believing in the &quot;change potential&quot; of tools is dubious at best: If an environment is hostile and negative, then social software tools aren&#039;t going to be helpful, at least not from the start.

Rather they can do more harm than good (yes, the costs of employee churn and turnover, when people look behind the nice talk and walk away, are substantial) - especially when they are put in place without changing methods, principles and paradigms of an organization. You may just end up with another round of underused tools ...

Sure, tools can be change facilitators and they cam shift the internal organizational culture, but it&#039;s also clear that social software implementation efforts need substantial support, resources, leadership time and energy (and, yes, external consulting sometimes) - installing tools is only the easiest and cheapest part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bertrand, this is so true &#8211; believing in the &#8220;change potential&#8221; of tools is dubious at best: If an environment is hostile and negative, then social software tools aren&#8217;t going to be helpful, at least not from the start.</p>
<p>Rather they can do more harm than good (yes, the costs of employee churn and turnover, when people look behind the nice talk and walk away, are substantial) &#8211; especially when they are put in place without changing methods, principles and paradigms of an organization. You may just end up with another round of underused tools &#8230;</p>
<p>Sure, tools can be change facilitators and they cam shift the internal organizational culture, but it&#8217;s also clear that social software implementation efforts need substantial support, resources, leadership time and energy (and, yes, external consulting sometimes) &#8211; installing tools is only the easiest and cheapest part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

