Information is like water (part 2)



Thanks to Oscar Berg.

Links for 06/30/2008

  • Consider the following five simple scenarios based on real situations I have witnessed during my time in the Richemont Group. I must stress that I expect these to be relevant today to a majority of retail Organizations, and not only in the luxury sector:

    tags: knowledge, knowledgemanagement, value, valuecreation, sales

    • ”[..] an organization is nothing more than the collective capacity of its people to create value” (Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., former CEO of IBM)
    • By reinventing the wheel we might improve it, but is it worth the costs when all that is needed is a regular wheel?
    • Knowledge is power and even more now than ever. However, if organizational knowledge is retained and not shared, is the organization as a whole really gaining any lasting power from it?
    • Everybody is replaceable, yes but at what costs?
    • It is reasonable to assume that each department builds on past successes and is expert in his field. However, wouldn’t each project of a particular department benefit from the proactive input of all other stakeholders?
    • Learning and innovation depends on a culture encouraging risk-taking and therefore making “mistakes”. However, shouldn’t this imply that we all collectively learn from these “mistakes” and avoid making them twice?
  • An employee has a great idea, but needs clearance from his manager and a manager in another department to get the idea over departmental boundaries. That person can directly engage that manager and solve the problem. This contradicts the present model of hierarchies and organization charts in that traditionally the employee would be forced to navigate the branches in an org chart. This obviously depletes time and resources so we’ll consider this waste.
    Perhaps the second best use of bottom up communication is that it allows companies to innovate using informal networks. BUP spurs informal networks inside and outside of companies. These informals can consist of employees, suppliers, customers, or other constituents. Typically an employee solves problems within the department or team and requests a manager’s assistance when needed. An informal network may involve a supplier a customer and a VP. A recent IBM podcast references innovation as accidental. It never happens on purpose and it usually doesn’t happen in a formal setting. Furthermore, for the informal setting to work, the right tools and stimuli must be present. This is where we really see how web 2.0 streamlines innovation.

    tags: organizationalcharts, problemsolving, informalnetworks, innovation, collaboration, management, organization

  • tags: enterprise2.0, socialmedia, silos, measurement, businessunit, remuneration, assessment

Great : Jean-François Noubel on collective intelligence at the Global HR Forum

A little bit lenghty but it’s really worth !

Links for 06/29/2008

One day, every project will be agile

The time is not far when the question of reinventing project management will be a key issue. The purpose will be to reconsider a project as something that have to fulfill a need and not an objective by itself as it’s so often. How can we see a project is its own purpose ? When, at the end, what is delivered totally matches with what what decided at the beginning and, at the same time, people realize it doesn’t fulfill the need because the need has evolved in the meanwhile, or that the client (internal or external) agreed to something that didn’t was not really what he expected, perhaps by lack of communication or bad understanding to what could actually be done.

By being next to developers all day long, I looked at the way they were working and it seems to me these guys discovered a kind of Holy Graal called agile method.

Of course I immediately tried to find if it could be use for other kind of projects than software development.

[Read more...]

Links for 06/26/2008

Information is like water



Via Oscar Berg.

How Enterprise 2.0 can help managing and improving organizational capital to support strategy

This is the third (and last) post of the series about enterprise 2.0 and intangible assets. Why do “organization capital” ? It’s the ability to mobilize and support the change process that is needed to support strategy.

It’s made of four elements :

- culture : appropriation of the vision and key values needed to support strategy

- leadershp : presence of skilled leaders at every level of the organization

- alignment : link between objective and individual and collective reawards to reach strategic goals

- teamwork : shared knowledge across the organization;

In concrete terms those components are about behavioral change. Some are dedicated to value creation (focus on client, be reative and innovant, deliver results), some to strategy execution (undertanding the mission, the rules, link the financial aspects to strategy, communicate with transparency, team work).

Do we really need to add anything since the link with E2.0 seems obvious ?

[Read more...]

Everything and its opposite about using social networks at the office

This week again the squabble about “pro or against using social networks at work” delivered some new arguments. While CNN was telling us using social networks at work could bring some benefits, the Confederation of British Industry ways saying exactly the opposite, stating it makes companies loose billions.

What’s the truth, if there’s any ?

[Read more...]

The Next Step in Open Innovation

Distributed innovation, collaboration with clients and partners are becoming central in companies’ strategic reflexion.

To learn more about this subject I often discuss here, it’s at McKinsey’s.