<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When 2.0 dissolves into businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/09/11/when-20-dissolves-into-businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/09/11/when-20-dissolves-into-businesses/</link>
	<description>The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertrand DUPERRIN</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/09/11/when-20-dissolves-into-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-49742</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertrand DUPERRIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=633#comment-49742</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our organizations in many ways look like traditional industrial companies with org charts, processes and accounting that were designed for mass production. But value creation has moved “off balance sheet.”&quot;
I wouldn&#039;t have said it better. Btw it implies that value creation as shifted from production to somewhere else... conception and idea management ?

Did some classic activities shift to 2.0 &quot;naturally&quot; because it was more efficient ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our organizations in many ways look like traditional industrial companies with org charts, processes and accounting that were designed for mass production. But value creation has moved “off balance sheet.”&#8221;<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t have said it better. Btw it implies that value creation as shifted from production to somewhere else&#8230; conception and idea management ?</p>
<p>Did some classic activities shift to 2.0 &#8220;naturally&#8221; because it was more efficient ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2008/09/11/when-20-dissolves-into-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-49603</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=633#comment-49603</guid>
		<description>This is a great discussion of the challenge that every businessperson is facing (whether they realize it or not). We live at the cusp of two eras with a foot firmly in each. Our organizations in many ways look like traditional industrial companies with org charts, processes and accounting that were designed for mass production. But value creation has moved &quot;off balance sheet.&quot; We are feeling our way into the 2.0 world without much structure or help. The tough part is deciding which foot to move as you take each new step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great discussion of the challenge that every businessperson is facing (whether they realize it or not). We live at the cusp of two eras with a foot firmly in each. Our organizations in many ways look like traditional industrial companies with org charts, processes and accounting that were designed for mass production. But value creation has moved &#8220;off balance sheet.&#8221; We are feeling our way into the 2.0 world without much structure or help. The tough part is deciding which foot to move as you take each new step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

