<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficiency, performance, constraints and things 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/04/16/efficiency-performance-constraints-and-things-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/04/16/efficiency-performance-constraints-and-things-20/</link>
	<description>The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Sensemaking KM and CoPs (Just-in-time vs Just-in-case), engaging and embedded KM, and a competitive vs collaborative culture :: November :: 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/04/16/efficiency-performance-constraints-and-things-20/comment-page-1/#comment-61961</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Sensemaking KM and CoPs (Just-in-time vs Just-in-case), engaging and embedded KM, and a competitive vs collaborative culture :: November :: 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1191#comment-61961</guid>
		<description>[...] Betrand Duperrin also parallels these thoughts: &#8220;They would be more efficient if they helped each other? But in order to get a good evaluation and the related rewards and bonuses they have, in the best case, to ignore each other, in the worse case to play the one against another.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Betrand Duperrin also parallels these thoughts: &#8220;They would be more efficient if they helped each other? But in order to get a good evaluation and the related rewards and bonuses they have, in the best case, to ignore each other, in the worse case to play the one against another.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Is knowledge hoarding all about your pay cheque? :: May :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/04/16/efficiency-performance-constraints-and-things-20/comment-page-1/#comment-54982</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Is knowledge hoarding all about your pay cheque? :: May :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1191#comment-54982</guid>
		<description>[...] 18/04/09: Efficiency, performance, constraints and things 2.0 - &#8220;Then come the policies laid down by the organization. Of the the most obvious example is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 18/04/09: Efficiency, performance, constraints and things 2.0 &#8211; &#8220;Then come the policies laid down by the organization. Of the the most obvious example is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/04/16/efficiency-performance-constraints-and-things-20/comment-page-1/#comment-54980</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1191#comment-54980</guid>
		<description>Etant donnee le conclusion ... &quot;explore how to increase performance by remioving constraints instead of adding pressure&quot;

... you probably know of this blog post by Euan Semple from March 2007 titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://theobvious.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/the_100_guarant.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The 100% guaranteed easiest way to do enterprise 2.0&quot;.&lt;/a&gt;

It offers three main suggestions:

1) Do Nothing
2) Get out of the way
3) Keep the energy levels up

Those suggestions sound provocative.  You have to read the post to understand more fully why this relates to removing constraints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Etant donnee le conclusion &#8230; &#8220;explore how to increase performance by remioving constraints instead of adding pressure&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; you probably know of this blog post by Euan Semple from March 2007 titled <a href="http://theobvious.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/the_100_guarant.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The 100% guaranteed easiest way to do enterprise 2.0&#8243;.</a></p>
<p>It offers three main suggestions:</p>
<p>1) Do Nothing<br />
2) Get out of the way<br />
3) Keep the energy levels up</p>
<p>Those suggestions sound provocative.  You have to read the post to understand more fully why this relates to removing constraints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

