<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The social vs process debate makes no sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/06/09/the-social-vs-process-debate-makes-no-sense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/06/09/the-social-vs-process-debate-makes-no-sense/</link>
	<description>The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The social vs process debate makes no sense &#187; Dig for Leadership - Stories that try to make the world a better place.</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/06/09/the-social-vs-process-debate-makes-no-sense/comment-page-1/#comment-56200</link>
		<dc:creator>The social vs process debate makes no sense &#187; Dig for Leadership - Stories that try to make the world a better place.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1239#comment-56200</guid>
		<description>[...] clearly understood what he meant but, in some ways, I was not comfortable with&#8230; carry on reading.   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clearly understood what he meant but, in some ways, I was not comfortable with&#8230; carry on reading.   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

