<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does driving adoption mean being off the point ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/26/does-driving-adoption-mean-being-off-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/26/does-driving-adoption-mean-being-off-the-point/</link>
	<description>The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/26/does-driving-adoption-mean-being-off-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-62797</link>
		<dc:creator>David Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1416#comment-62797</guid>
		<description>Why are you changing your user&#039;s practices? Maybe you should think about not doing that. If you go ahead with it, they will keep doing what they always did, and deal with your system on the side. The cost of the system will shift from IT to the user&#039;s department. The promised ROI might show up on paper,  but no in reality. 

Congrats for having the intuition that told you something was wrong. Before the dot boom, most  CIOs couldn&#039;t see that they were getting the productivity promised by the vendors of the systems they were installing. The intuition goes on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you changing your user&#8217;s practices? Maybe you should think about not doing that. If you go ahead with it, they will keep doing what they always did, and deal with your system on the side. The cost of the system will shift from IT to the user&#8217;s department. The promised ROI might show up on paper,  but no in reality. </p>
<p>Congrats for having the intuition that told you something was wrong. Before the dot boom, most  CIOs couldn&#8217;t see that they were getting the productivity promised by the vendors of the systems they were installing. The intuition goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/26/does-driving-adoption-mean-being-off-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-62794</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1416#comment-62794</guid>
		<description>Brilliant!

I have a tendency to stomp my feet and stand my ground when a topic irritates me. Thanks for covering all the relevant points in my head that I&#039;m not always able to successfully lay out the case for.

To illustrate further, we get in a car. We have to expend our own energy pushing on the gas pedal, and by doing so we&#039;re burning fuel. There are a lot of people doing just that -- burning fuel. But where are they going and is anyone going with them (or are they just plowing them over). People are already in motion. The brilliant designs simply tap that motion and/or gets the rubbish out of their way so their paths are smoother.

The only drivers here are the people themselves -- we need to be building the infrastructure for them to drive to their heart&#039;s content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>
<p>I have a tendency to stomp my feet and stand my ground when a topic irritates me. Thanks for covering all the relevant points in my head that I&#8217;m not always able to successfully lay out the case for.</p>
<p>To illustrate further, we get in a car. We have to expend our own energy pushing on the gas pedal, and by doing so we&#8217;re burning fuel. There are a lot of people doing just that &#8212; burning fuel. But where are they going and is anyone going with them (or are they just plowing them over). People are already in motion. The brilliant designs simply tap that motion and/or gets the rubbish out of their way so their paths are smoother.</p>
<p>The only drivers here are the people themselves &#8212; we need to be building the infrastructure for them to drive to their heart&#8217;s content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertrand DUPERRIN</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/26/does-driving-adoption-mean-being-off-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-62778</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertrand DUPERRIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1416#comment-62778</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure your most successful members also focused on what drives adoption instead of adoption itself (even unconsciously).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure your most successful members also focused on what drives adoption instead of adoption itself (even unconsciously).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan scrupski</title>
		<link>http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/11/26/does-driving-adoption-mean-being-off-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-62777</link>
		<dc:creator>susan scrupski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1416#comment-62777</guid>
		<description>The 2.0 Alignment Council... I love it!  Too soon though. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2.0 Alignment Council&#8230; I love it!  Too soon though. <img src='http://www.duperrin.com/english/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

