Comments on: Enterprise 2.0′s weakness ? Decision http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/12/29/enterprise-2-0s-weakness-decision/ The most successful companies are those that think jointly technological change, work design and the changes in internal social relationships.” Antoine Riboud. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:51:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: yilmazmustafa http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/12/29/enterprise-2-0s-weakness-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-63379 yilmazmustafa Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:27:17 +0000 http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1427#comment-63379 I need help too, for a beta test account on 12Sprints. Could anyone do?<br><br>Thanks for responses.<br><br>Mustafa YILMAZ<br><a href="mailto:yilmazmustafa@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">yilmazmustafa@gmail.com</a> I need help too, for a beta test account on 12Sprints. Could anyone do?

Thanks for responses.

Mustafa YILMAZ
yilmazmustafa@gmail.com

]]> By: Bertrand Duperrin http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/12/29/enterprise-2-0s-weakness-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-63377 Bertrand Duperrin Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:38:53 +0000 http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1427#comment-63377 @Itsinsider : you're right, not everything has to be transparent. <br><br>Sometimes the person who submits something is not expecting anything to happen, or at least he knows that not 100% submissions can be taken into account. In this case this is ok.<br><br>Sometimes people are strongly ask to participate. In this case, if the company does want people to disengage, it would be good to explain why something was taken into account or not.<br><br>Last, sometimes managers can't say "why" because they know something that participants don't have to know at this time. This is a kind of "grey zone" where the best policy for managers is "wise sense".<br><br>Anyway, either a decision is made or not to turn knowledge into action and tangible benefits, the process that makes that the decision can happen has exist and people who have to play a part in it should be aware of their role in this new context.<br><br>As for SAP I'll have a closer look once the "end of year frenzy" has ended. I'll let you know if I need any help ;) @Itsinsider : you're right, not everything has to be transparent.

Sometimes the person who submits something is not expecting anything to happen, or at least he knows that not 100% submissions can be taken into account. In this case this is ok.

Sometimes people are strongly ask to participate. In this case, if the company does want people to disengage, it would be good to explain why something was taken into account or not.

Last, sometimes managers can't say “why” because they know something that participants don't have to know at this time. This is a kind of “grey zone” where the best policy for managers is “wise sense”.

Anyway, either a decision is made or not to turn knowledge into action and tangible benefits, the process that makes that the decision can happen has exist and people who have to play a part in it should be aware of their role in this new context.

As for SAP I'll have a closer look once the “end of year frenzy” has ended. I'll let you know if I need any help ;)

]]> By: itsinsider http://www.duperrin.com/english/2009/12/29/enterprise-2-0s-weakness-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-63376 itsinsider Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:11:25 +0000 http://www.duperrin.com/english/?p=1427#comment-63376 Hi Bertrand. This version is a little rough on the translation, but I agree with the gist of your argument here. One comment, however. Even if management is engaged in the conversation/discussion (or not in many cases), management sometimes has that "bigger picture" view that dictates decision-making. In other words, the team may not be aware of a strategic initiative currently under discussion that would impact endorsing a particular POV and would presumably be counter to the firm's planning. To be honest, it's where transparency becomes dicey. Not everything can be transparent.<br><br>That said, I highly recommend you get yourself a beta account (maybe I can help?) to SAP's new 12Sprints tool. It does exactly what you're asking for here. Its primary goal is decision-making. Hi Bertrand. This version is a little rough on the translation, but I agree with the gist of your argument here. One comment, however. Even if management is engaged in the conversation/discussion (or not in many cases), management sometimes has that “bigger picture” view that dictates decision-making. In other words, the team may not be aware of a strategic initiative currently under discussion that would impact endorsing a particular POV and would presumably be counter to the firm's planning. To be honest, it's where transparency becomes dicey. Not everything can be transparent.

That said, I highly recommend you get yourself a beta account (maybe I can help?) to SAP's new 12Sprints tool. It does exactly what you're asking for here. Its primary goal is decision-making.

]]>