Business awareness : the social signal without relationship

Summary : Everytime we talk about social media we focus on rich relationships and exchanges, conversations, community feeling, what are very heavy and complex things to make happen. That’s forgetting that there’s a lighter and at least as productive way to use social channels : a short, factual social signal that aims at informing hand helping people to visualize their environment without engaging too much. Social media can be awesome “business awareness” tools without needing strong interpersonnal relationships.

The assumption is easy to get : social tools bring more intensity and flexibility in the way people and information behave, get organizaed, interact and thats makes it easier to invent new way of collaborating within any organization or between a business and its ecosystem. Social networks that provide lots of tool to support interpersonal relationships has become the incarnation of these approaches to such an extent that they’re often shown as the solution to any problem.

But is the monolithic vision of social networking that comes with social media relevant.

1°) Does a social network need to be conversational

It started with a conversation I had with a friend about a general public tool on the web but it can also apply to enterprise tools. We were talking about foursquare and a friend told me : “why do you use foursquare ? xxxx is much better and more engaging”. My answer “Humm…I’m not convinced”. “Yes Bertrand, on foursquare people usually check in to say where they are while on XXXXX they say things, share their state of mind, share photos, have conversations”. “How to say…In fact I don’t care at all about all these things”.

Let me explain : what I like in such tools is that I can know who is where. Everything else ils superfluous and pollutes the signal. On Foursquqre I’m looking for location information and not digressions about moods or the state of mind of M. So-and-so. There are other channels for that.

These tools are “ambient awareness” tools : they have to send short and low signals (not aggressive or intrusive), coming from my ecosystem and too much information and conversation kills the signal, making it hard to hear.

That reminds me off the conversation I had years ago with Reid Hoffman about what he called “Business Intelligence for People”. Today, I’d rather say “business awarness”  but the fact remains : being social does not always mean having lots of conversation and engaging a lot but receiving / sharing a clear and short signal in order to visualize / help others to visualize what is their informational context, what’s happening in their relational environment.

So there’s a wide part of the social activity that has not to be conversationnal, rich in terms of content and interaction, and where, in fact, interactions are rather the exception than the nom. What matters there is to improve people awareness about something (business in this case) with a a clear and not overloading signal.

2°) Do social networks need to be bijective and global ? No. [Read more...]

Picture of the week #11: That’s not Abundance but Excellence….

That’s not Abundance but Excellence that will make you a rich man

Joseph Joubert

Illustration from the book “The Golden Rules for Success“.

Thanks to Thierry d’Auzers for this excellent book, the rights of use and Dimitri Tolstoï for the pictures.

Offer yourself The Golden rules for Success.

Browse the previously published pictures of the week.

Get the iPhone or Ipad App.

Links for this week (weekly)

  • “Fathoming a new product from IBM via a launch event is like trying to understand the ocean by watching a wave. Nonetheless that was my task, swimming through the presentations and ultimately landing an interview with Jeffrey Schick, IBM’s VP of Social Software. Drenched in the vision Schick shared for the IBM Customer Experience Suite, it occurred to me that IBM could end up being more important to the business use and monetization of social media than Facebook.”

    tags: ibm customerexperience socialmedia facebook monetization organization competitiveadvantage

    • By taking the capabilities they’ve created for big
      companies and putting them on the cloud, smaller businesses may indeed
      be able to leverage these services and according to Schick, “easily
      create a community that would allow them to invite their clients and
      engage them.”
    • Schick expects that “people can get genuine business value [from it].”
      While dialog is important, all of this, according to Schick, “is done to
      drive revenue, to create better customer satisfaction and gain some
      competitive advantage.”
    • Businesses of all sizes need to think social across their intranets,
      extranets, the internet itself and the emerging mobile marketplace
    • Regardless of your business size, IBM’s big move into
      social software should be a clear indication that every business needs a
      broad-reaching social strategy not just a Facebook fan page!
  • “The traditional methods for driving operational excellence in global organizations are not enough. The most effective organizations make smart use of employee networks to reduce costs, improve efficiency and spur innovation. “

    tags: networks socialnetworks costs costreduction efficiency innovation operations collaboration connectivity performance engagement report stakeholders alignment networkanalysis socialnetworkanalysis

    • CIOs often try to address these challenges by relying on the same managerial tools they use to pursue operational excellence: establishing well-defined roles, best practice processes and formal accountability structures.
    • The key to delivering both operational excellence and innovation is having networks of informal collaboration. Within IT organizations in large global companies, we have seen that innovative solutions often emerge unexpectedly through informal and unplanned interactions between individuals who see problems from different perspectives.
      • Executives should analyze employee collaboration networks to discover how high-performing individuals and teams connect.
      • Networks should be designed to optimize the flow of good ideas across function, distance and technical specialty.
      • Network analysis can show where too much connectivity slows decision making.
    • Attain benefits of scale through effective global collaboration: Organizations can construct teams to leverage diverse expertise and drive adoption of new ideas across geographies. By carefully studying collaboration challenges across functions and geographies, they can identify gaps and enhance connectivity and best practice transfer in targeted ways.

    • Drive work force engagement and performance: Uncovering the network characteristics of high performers can show employees who play similar roles how to improve their own performance. It can help leaders identify the individuals who energize the organization and how to leverage their contributions.

    • Align collaborative with business partners and external stakeholders: CIOs need to know how effectively their units serve the needs of business stakeholders. By creating a detailed map of the existing cross-departmental relationships, they can see where innovations are occurring, where sufficient support is being provided and where investments should be made.
    • Minimize network inefficiencies and costs: Although collaboration is often seen as a virtue, too much collaboration at too many organizational levels can be a negative. It is important to reduce network connectivity at points where collaboration fails to produce sufficient value.
  • “Finding structural efficiencies by expanding spans of control has become a necessity in the current economic climate. However, the i4cp study shows that flattening organizational structure doesn’t necessarily result in a competitive advantage. While there are advantages, organizational restructuring may lead to greater stress, disengagement and burnout among middle managers.”

    tags: management organization middlemanagement flatorganization control hierarchy reporting

    • Over 35% of managers in large companies already have 11 to 25 employees reporting to them, and 75% of companies expect those numbers to rise or remain the same in the future.
    • Middle managers are often the hardest hit since expanding spans of control at multiple levels of the organization exponentially enlarges the number of people they are both directly and indirectly accountable for managing. Middle managers, the key players for successful strategy execution, “report dramatically lower levels of contentment than their more senior colleagues do, as well as less of a desire to stay with their current employers,” according to a 2009 McKinsey report.
  • “In Three Enterprise 2.0 Themes You Should Be Watching in 2010, I argued that the world of social software would bifurcate into:

    1. General collaboration suites that replace intranets and portals
    2. Specialized applications that deliver tangible value around a specific activity”

    tags: enterprise2.0 value innovation crowdsourcing collaboration emergence emergentcollaboration structuredcollaboration

    • In the second item, it’s a case of clear intent. Applying social principles to solve tangible issues for organizations. The applications are designed with deeper domain features to deliver results.

      But in some cases, you’re seeing vendors pursuing a “we-can-do-everything” approach, loading up their application with features addressing disparate business needs. A case of being betwixt and between.

      • Going back to the characteristic of “specific social intent”. The corollary to that is that if you’re a product firm delivering around a specific intent, it becomes quite clear:

        • What “job” organizations and people are hiring you for
        • What practical issues people are running into
        • What your company’s development path should be
  • “en voulant intégrer toutes les fonctionnalités 2.0 dont les blogues, les wikis, les réseaux ¨sociaux¨ internes, le tagging, les mashups ou les idéagoras, on pose pour les entreprises les problèmes du contrôle de l’information, de la liberté d’expression, de la protection des données stratégiques et par le fait même, de la sécurité. On ne s’adresse pas seulement à un enjeu technologique mais bien un enjeu¨systémique¨, car quand on planifie des modifications 2.0, on vient toucher l’ensemble de l’écosystème intranet d’entreprise, tel qu’illustré dans ce diagramme publié récemment par l‘Observatoire de l’intranet en France”

    tags: intranet intranet2.0 systemic technology management processes customization collaboration operation

    • ECOSYSTEME
    • PERSON20
    • Donc, trois niveaux personnalisés de communautés: 1- de pratique 2- d’intérêt et 3- de projet. Ces trois niveaux sont eux-mêmes intégrés dans les quatre niveaux supérieurs de personnalisation que sont: 1- mes infos. 2- mon profil 3- mon groupe et 4- mes outils et qui eux, répondent à trois autres niveaux ultimes de personnalisation et qui servent à définir tout individu au sein d’une organisation: moi en tant qu’employé, moi dans mon groupe et moi dans mon entreprise.
  • tags: enterprise2.0 report collaboration adoption performance businessperformance whitepaper socialmedia socialnetworks

  • “1. Companies that widely harnessed social software (best-in-class) took on average 11 hours to bring a response team together for a key business threat, while industry average companies took 113 hours and laggards 105.
    2. Best in class companies took five months to complete key strategic projects, while industry average companies took 8 months and laggards a staggering 14 months.
    3. Best-in-class companies saw a 36 percent decrease in time to enact key business changes based on customer feedback, while laggards experienced a 17 percent increase.”

    tags: socialsoftware enterprise2.0 organization productivity benefits performance businessperformance

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Information security is too serious to be entrusted to IT people

Summary : I recently read a survey about the dangerosity of social networks regarding to information leak, relying on the observation of a representative group of people. That’s a hasity concusion : it only proves that information security is not only a matter of technology but of usages, behaviors, a dimension that IT departements still barely master because they consider the issue from a technological standpoint. As an evidence, it seems that IT people are those who are the most likely to have dangerous behaviors, maybe because they only consider the technological side of the problem and overlook the behavioral one.

Recently I found a study about the dangerosity of some tools considering information leak. It says that email is the first cause of leaks (but is it a surprise) and that social networks are becoming a growing cause of such issues, what is not surprising because as they’re becoming more and more popular the risk is growing proportionally.

When I’m asked my opinion, my answer is always the same : no tool is dangerous by itself. It’s usage can be. Said differently : an irresponsible person is dangerous with any communication tool, even a homing pigeon. And the best way to fight irresponsibily is education, not interdiction. As a matter of fact when people are prohibited doing something without being educated, they send their time cheating with the system what may cause even more problems.

This study won’t make me change my mind. The way it was conducted is quite interesting :

The study sample group included 2,000 users from all over the world registered on one of the most popular social networks. These users were randomly chosen in order to cover different aspects: sex (1,000 females, 1,000 males), age (the sample ranged from 17 to 65 years with a mean age of 27.3 years), professional affiliation, interests etc. In the first step, the users were only requested to add the unknown test profile as their friend, while in the second step several conversations with randomly selected users aimed to determine what kind of details they would disclose.

The study showed:

  • More than 86 percent of the users who accepted the test-profile’s friend request work in the IT industry, of which 31 percent work in IT Security
  • The most frequent reason for accepting the test profile’s friend request was her “lovely face” (53 percent)
  • After a half an hour conversation, 10 percent disclosed personal sensitive information, such as: address, phone number, mother’s and father’s name, etc – information usually requested as answers to password recovery questions
  • Two hours later, 73 percent siphoned what appears to be confidential information from their workplace, such as future strategies, plans, as well as unreleased technologies/software

Some points to notice.

- some people accept a friend reques from an unknown person. It confirms my assumption. The problem is about people and the way their awareness about this kind of issue has been raised. There are two options. Either they would do exactly the same if they bumped into this nice looking girl in a bar and a full education program has to be implemented across the orgation or the fact they are online makes them lose their common sense and they have to be taught than the web is like real life : don’t follow a stranger.

Let me add that we already have more dangerous tools than social networks : familiy lunches, parties with friends and colleagues have been perfect situations for information leak for ages. I don’t even mention discussions in trains, people you can read their laptop screen when seated next to them etc…

- IT people are even more dangerous than others. Of course because they only see things through a technological point of view and only consider technological responses. A secured tool can be real strainer if people don’t use it well. Non IT people perceive the risk through a behavioral point of view, they analyze the nature of the context and of the relationship and may be more mistrustful.

Conclusion : anything that has to do with information security is not only a matter of technology and IT people may not be the best to handle the whole problem. Security is about technology and behaviors, this second point needing a specific program to be approached.

A last example. What’s better ? An employee who’s aware of dangers and uses Facebook or a non aware employee that can’t use facebook at work but uses it on mobile and at home ? The second is made harmless while he’s in the office but will be dangerous when he’s outside unless he’s educated.

Of course, pushing the “off” buttion is easier than implementing an awareness program. But it doesn’t solve everything.

Social is a substitute for quality and customers don’t care about you

Summary : Lots of things are being said about the revival of the customer relationship made possible by social media and that’s a good thing, a more human way of doing things, less mechanized, aiming a building a richer and fruitful relationship for everybody. But businesses should be careful of too easy things and smoke and mirrors. We hear lots of things about “fans”, “passionate”, “engagement”, suggesting that if a business shows as much interest to its customers as they show to the brand, a positive impression is generated, the company improves its image and sells more. But thinking that it’s all about communication and good feelings is a dead end. Most of customers are not passionate nor fans but…simple customers. In the same way, internauts who try to pick brands up on the web are not always potential customers but only people in search of recognition and favors. In short, customers expect businesses to keep their promise and use the web as a channel to remind it to them. Keeping communication and service separated, thinking that there’s no link between communication and quality programs is a big mistake. The lower quality is the more the web is stragic to gather feebacks in order to improve quality.

Bringing good feelings and more intensity in a relationship is good but should not make overlook what matters : the product, its quality and its appropriateness to the demand.


It’s mpre and more said that customers have to be considered as partners, stakeholders, and have to be involved in co-building and co-decision programs what aim at maximizing what all parts take from the relation. Customers love brands and want a strong relationship with them…and brands should give them as much love in return because their purpose is to make customers happy. So everything seems to be perfect in a world where love and respect are getting the upper hand on basely material and financial concerns.

Ok. Now let’s top kidding. Even if the final result will be the same, we should not mistake ourselves about the mechanisms at stake.

1°) Customers are a business partners that have an impressive nuisance potential…

Collaboration between customers and suppliers is nothing new? What is new is that, now, it can apply to small individual customers, not only to B2B relationships. Why did the customer become that worthy of attention ? Because he can spend more money than before ? Not at all. Only because he’s now able to shout louder that before its love or hate…and even to gather with others to make even more noise .

Is business becoming more human ? No. It’s just about a more balanced relationship. And those who can harm always deserve more consideration.

2°) Some customers are true lovers…

Some brands have real fans, people they must capitalize on. Their paradox is that they seldom expect anything in return : they never complain and ask for few interactions. A simple “thank you” is enough and they feel as is they were vested with a mission. They talk a lot around them and spread the word.

3°) But the wide majority only expects you to keep your promises [Read more...]

Picture of the week #10 : Never Forget than those who shine…

Never forget than those who shine depend on those who are in the shadows

Illustration from the book “The Golden Rules for Success“.

Thanks to Thierry d’Auzers for this excellent book, the rights of use and Dimitri Tolstoï for the pictures.

Offer yourself The Golden rules for Success.

Browse the previously published pictures of the week.

Get the iPhone or Ipad App.

Links for this week (weekly)


  • Concrètement, « le temps de travail des Français est de plus en plus morcelé. Dominés par l’informatique et les télécommunications, les salariés sont sollicités en permanence par la messagerie interne, les messages instantanés, les appels téléphoniques, les SMS et toutes sortes d’alertes. »

    tags: interruption interruptivity email socialnetworks work interactions

      • 93,3 % des Français passent plus de 4h par jour sur leur ordinateur (70 % + de 6h)
      • 70 % déclarent utiliser leur ordinateur pour gérer leurs affaires personnelles au bureau
      • Plus d’1 Français sur 2 se connecte à des réseaux sociaux durant ses heures de travail 
      • Près d’1 message sur 3 revêt un caractère non professionnel
      • 75 % avouent interrompre leur travail pour regarder le contenu d’un nouveau message qu’ils viennent de recevoir
      • Pour plus des deux tiers des Français, ce qui est urgent passe avant ce qui est important, et 25 % des sondés estiment ne travailler que dans l’urgence
    • Le travail devient une interaction

      Bien entendu, être interrompu à cause d’un contact (peu importe le moyen) n’a rien d’exceptionnel au travail, et est même recommandé. Cela fait partie du travail en somme. « La conclusion de notre étude est simple mais d’une portée étonnante : l’entreprise est de moins en moins un lieu de production au sens classique du terme. Le travail devient une interaction, un échange, un dialogue permanent. L’entreprise favorise et exige cette interactivité dont elle fournit les outils. Cette évolution est profonde et pourrait bien changer fondamentalement notre relation au travail, son organisation et ses valeurs » commente ainsi Jérôme Anrès, PDG de Sciforma.

  • “A panel of CIOs, academics and industry experts has urged IT departments to adapt or risk falling foul of business. The panel, comprising speakers who will be presenting at the 360°IT event later this month have warned that IT departments could become extinct if they are unable to support technology-savvy users using their own IT rather than corporate-approved systems.”

    tags: CIO IT ITdepartment security consumerization risk riskmanagement

    • He says, “In the public sector, there is a belief that you can control information. In social media there is very little control. We need situation awareness.”
    • All technology needs to be secured, not locked down
    • In practical terms, Longbottom recommends that the business defines a risk profile then builds a taxonomy for the information it creates and uses.
    • The consumerisation of IT will mean these standards need to be granular, such as approving the iPhone or Android application programming interface, rather than stipulating a corporate IT-approved product like Internet Explorer.
    • For instance if it takes 15 minutes to log onto a virtual private network (VPN) and the VPN is used every day by 100,000 staff, the real cost to the business is 25,000 hours or 2.85 man years.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Enterprise 2.0 and ROI : forget the “whether” and focus on the “how”.

Summary : even if the concep of ROI, in its traditional sense, hardly hardly works for enterprise 2.0, overlooking the question of tangible benefits tha should be expected is impossible. But the reasonnings on this issue suffer from a noticeable bias : technology is assessed in the current context while it needs organizational and management changes to deliver its effects. So there are few chances to have a solid demonstration if the focus is kept on the existence of ROI without a joint reflexion on how to make it happen.

The ROI of Enterprise 2.0 is interesting because it’s at the same time unavoidable and a problem that’s impossible to solve without rethinking the whole paradigm of value creation.

First, I’d like state something. I’m using the word ROI because it’s the one we all use to discuss this point while I think that “measurable improvement” would be more relevant.

Then, I’ll start with a metaphor. If a logical and rational thinking makes us deduct that an engine is the best solution to make a car move and that, despite your car has one that works, your car don’t move when you accelerate, it may mean two things. The first is that ou forgot to shift the gear box on the right position, the second is that it’s not connected to the transmission. Instead to trying to fix the engine or throwing it away, what needs a fix is the transmission.

Then let’s talk about ROA (return on assets). The number is well known but John Hagel recently reminded it to us : it has dropped to 25% of what it was in 1965 while people’s productivity has been skyrocketting in the meanwhile. Conclusion : that’s not employees that don’t pedal fast enough but the organization that struggles at turning their effort into value. So the solution is not to blame employees and put even more pressure on them but to rethink the way work is organized and people are managed.

Now, have a look at new ways of doing things and the tools that support them. Anyone with few objectivity understands that the easier it is for employees to access resources and expertises in a fluid way that helps to save time, the quicker problem solving and the better made decisions made will be. But since this system is hardly systematizable, organizations keep their old way of doying things. What means telling the cyclist to pedal harder and harder while the chain is broken.

So the true question about ROI is not to know if it exists but how to turn a potential into actual benefits. This is not about social media or behaviors (even if it will play a part) but about “plumbing”.

That’s exactly what I wrote a couple of years ago about strategy maps and intangible assets :

• Value creation is indirect : intangible assets don’t create value by themselves, but through their use in business process.

• Value is contextual : the value of intangible assets depends on their alignment with strategy

• Value is potential : if business process don’t use those assets, their value remain potential and can’t be fully realized.

• Assets are bundled : intangible assets have to be use in conjuction with tangible assets.

So it’s logacally difficult if not impossible to demonstrate any kind of benefit and, most all all, to measure them, if the question of alignment has not been tackled and if processes have not been designed or fixed to actually rely more on intangible assets.

Organizations have to forget the old principle according to which tools ahave an endogenous value : the value of social tools is exogenous and can’t be delivered if tools are not used in the context of adapted processes.

So there are chances we keep on discussing the ROI of Enterprise 2.0 again and again for years if the focus is kept on “whether” it exists instead of “how to deliver it”. Even people who are convinced and don’t care about the “if” shoud care of the ‘how” that ensures that processes will be able to turn the potential into tangible benefits.

As my good friend Luis Suarez rencently wrote, we should learn to work smarter, not harder. Lett me add : provided we avoid to pedal better but in emptiness.

Picture of the week #9 : The Real boss in any business is the customer

The real Boss in any business is the customer. All he cares about is your attitude.

Illustration from the book “The Golden Rules for Success“.

Thanks to Thierry d’Auzers for this excellent book, the rights of use and Dimitri Tolstoï for the pictures.

Offer yourself The Golden rules for Success.

Browse the previously published pictures of the week.

Get the iPhone or Ipad App.

Links for this week (weekly)

  • “The Human Resources world is the ‘Rodney Dangerfield‘ of the executive suite, says Bill, and doesn’t get enough respect…partially because HR gets caught up in the important but time consuming world of enforcing compliance at City, State and country levels. While the CFO’s team keeps the financial records straight, HR has responsibilities for all other aspects of staying on the right side of the law.”

    tags: humanresources compliance collaboration strategy humancapital IT talentmanagement talents

    • HR gets a lot more respect for thinking strategically around key advantages such as ‘how do we use our people to attain the strategic objectives of the company?‘ and this is made possible with modern Talent Management Suite applications
    • In order to manage talent holistically these tools, if used, will help to diminish conflicts between HR, IT and Line of Business.
    • he plethora of online options for interacting and collaborating more effectively may be in place, but this doesn’t mean the professionals in the space, in this case buried in compliance requirements, are going to understand the value of investing time and money in them within their business context.
  • “Parallels with todays corporation? The neo-limbic looks like the corporate culture and the processes, whether they are explicit or implicit. The PFC looks like the collaborative and collective potential – when there’s a whole world of talents and knowledge to mine and the power of connections to leverage. The former runs our organizations, the latter may have hints for innovating and solving pervasive issues – though not fully sure how to use it, not sure where it will lead.”

    tags: enteprise2.0 brain culture processes collaboration problemsolving innovation adaptability networking

    • Back to our comparison, a conjecture would be that the enterprise has to get ready to welcome what may come from collaboration initiatives, and get the most of it. That is, without planning ahead what the result should  be, or how it should work. Just wait and see. And, it has to feed it with real and serious problems.
    • ? Probably one very important ingredient is a culture of change. Because whatever situation you address, there will always be a new and more complex one coming. The power of connected people needs to be tapped, but not tamed: new forms of collaboration, new forms of collective intelligence have to be fed with new issues.
    • The corporation does not age, but it can eventually die. It may become rigid, make errors in terms of adaptation, and then collapse – most corporations expire before they reach 40 years old[ii]. And in these times where everything accelerates, it is more than urgent to cultivate adaptability, even if it means welcoming uncertainty as a resource.
  • tags: humanresources web3.0

  • “Where is the travel sector headed? Which areas of distribution are going to see maximum growth? How is the whole travel planning, booking and in-destination process changing for the travellers? What is the role of technology and gadgets for additional sales channels and driving customer loyalty in the time to come?
    Susan Black (pictured), Co-Founder at The Black & Wright Group “

    tags: socialmedia travel travelindustry airlines socialcrm mobility marketing communication strategy

    • Ypartnership stated that mobile devices are destined to play an
      increasingly important role in the distribution and sale of travel services
      in years ahead
    • The
      industry believes that the obvious next big thing will be in the mobile
      space, going from where we’re at now –which is largely access and research
      – to a full-service booking path available directly from your device
    • We can’t ignore the size of social media,
      and its potential to help users engage with our brands, but it needs to
      be seen differently to the more transaction focused marketing channels
      – it’s a dialogue, not a broadcast.
    • For
      her part, Susan social media platforms are indeed very legitimate channels
      for travel companies – but – many travel companies are going headfirst
      into these channels without a developed strategy; without specific plans
      to measure what matters to them, based on the strategic goals; without
      sustainable tactics; underestimating the bandwidth, expertise, and cost
      associated with maintaining a robust social media presence; and finally,
      without a true sense of dialogue, that is the very essence of this channel.
    • Social
      media as an effective customer service and sales platform has yet to be
      proven, because it is still in its infanc
  • “Companies can spot these influencers, and work out all sorts of other things about their customers, by crunching vast quantities of calling data with sophisticated “network analysis” software. Instead of looking at the call records of a single customer at a time, it looks at customers within the context of their social network. The ability to retain customers is particularly important in hyper-competitive markets, “

    tags: socialnetworks socialnetworkanalysis customer retention mining

    • IBM, the supplier of the system used by Bharti Airtel, says its annual sales of such software, now growing at double-digit rates, will exceed $15 billion by 2015
    • Ellen Joyner of SAS, an analytics firm based in Cary, North Carolina, notes that more and more financial firms are using the software to uncover fraud. The latest version of SAS’s software identifies risky borrowers by examining their social networks and Internal Revenue Service records, she says.
    • The police department of Richmond, Virginia, has pioneered the use of network-analysis software to predict crimes.
    • Network analysis also has a useful role to play in counterterrorism. Terror groups are often decentralised, so mapping their social networks is akin to deciphering “a big spaghetti picture”, says Roy Lindelauf of the Royal Dutch Defence Academy, who develops software for intelligence agencies in the Netherlands
    • The capture of Saddam Hussein in 2003 was due in large part to the mapping of the social networks of his former chauffeurs, according to Bob Griffin, the chief executive of i2, a British firm which developed the software used in the manhunt.
    • Diplomatic services can use this information to help ideas spread. Brian Uzzi of Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, who advises intelligence agencies on democracy-promotion analytics, says diplomatic services are mapping the “tipping point” when ideas go mainstream in spite of government repression.
  • “Ce dossier est une forme d’introduction à la thématique.
    Au programme pour cette première version :
    - Mesure des intangibles
    - Exemple de mesures qualitatives”

    tags: intangible intangibleassets measurement metrics qualitativemeasures

  • “Les collaborateurs français seraient-ils les plus résistants aux-(nouvelles) technologies ou les moins bien informés des nouvelles pratiques de formation 2.0 ?”

    tags: hr2.0 training enterprise2.0 socialmedia e-learning seriousgames

  • “Not sure what you would think, but I strongly believe that social bookmarking and social tagging are still an important and rather critical part of a successful Enterprise 2.0 adoption strategy. I would even go one step further and state that social bookmarking / tagging are probably essential key elements behind the social computing philosophy altogether. Yet, it’s interesting to see how they both keep getting neglected time and time again, when they are just so critical. I mean, can you imagine … having your business put together and create a massive index of must-have links with annotations and tags across the board that would help you re-find content much much easier than through just the traditional taxonomies? No, neither could I.”

    tags: enterprise2.0 adoption socialbookmarking tagging knowledgesharing

    • Over the last few years we have been using Lotus Connections’ Dogear (Now renamed as Bookmarks), where we have been storing over 1 million public bookmarks (Over 640k of them unique!), and with over 2.7 million tags (Over 177k of them unique as well!) of annotated content that we have bumped into out there on our Intranet, as well as externally. That’s just not too bad, is it? Well, it gets better…
    • Not only did the perception, from knowledge workers, of the corporate search engine changed dramatically, but it also managed to save IBM $4.6 million a year in cost savings and productivity gain.
  • “Luis Suarez has a dream, and it’s one that many of us with our overloaded inboxes could well buy in to — a world without e-mail.

    In fact, it could be argued that Suarez is living the dream. In less than three years, he’s been able to reduce 90% of his incoming e-mail by communicating through social software, and he works full-time for IBM while living in the Canary Islands. The last six years of his 13-year IBM career have been spent working remotely from Gran Canaria, a place which he describes as “a paradise island,” and not just because his boss is 6,000 kilometers away.”

    tags: email IBM luissuarez informationoverload infobesity remotework

    • “As a remote employee, I’m wanted to prove to everyone that I could keep working for the company without using e-mail, relying almost … exclusively on social software tools to communicate daily with my team members.”
    • This is his proof, he says. The numbers show that social software isn’t about adding more work and stress, but looking for smarter ways to get the job done.
    • 1. Don’t Reply


      If you want to stop receiving so much e-mail, the number one rule is don’t reply to it. The more you reply, the more you will get bac

    • 2. Study Your Inbox


      Next, study your inbox. Evaluate the kind of personal interactions that are taking place there. For example, you may find out that you subscribe to a hundred newsletters and you don’t read any of them

    • 3. Tackle One Area a Week


      After you’ve evaluated you intake, slowly move one of those groups away from your inbox. Don’t try to cover them all in one go, because it will be too much.

      One week, unsubscribe from newsletters and try and find alternative sources such as a feed reader or relevant Twitter accounts.

  • “The same is true in the way employees are harnessing consumer technologies — social, mobile, video, and cloud. They’re improving how they do their jobs and solving your customer and business problems. And it’s not just a few employees; it’s a critical mass of employees. In a survey of more than 4,000 U.S. information workers, we found that 37% are using do-it-yourself technologies without IT’s permission. “

    tags: IT security socialnetworks customerservice CIO HERO empowerment

    • As a CIO with business acumen, Hambling understood that he and his IT organization needed a new contract with business managers and employees that allowed him to help with technology solutions while sharing the responsibility for business risk with employees and managers
    • They’ve also embedded IT staff directly into the cubicle farms of business employees; they’ve built innovative solutions with teams comprised of business and IT employees; they’ve created applications that empower employees to understand global risk through a familiar interactive map. They created a new contract with business managers and employees that gives IT professionals a place in the business.
    • Employees need to step up and behave responsibly (which means HR needs to be involved). Business managers need to roll up their sleeves and learn enough about the technology to understand the potential risks. (Managers also need to encourage and reward experimentation.) IT needs to assess and mitigate technology risk. And that means IT staff need to be much closer to business employees and activities so that they can help with technology platforms

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.