Logic without good sense leads to catastroph

Two weeks ago  I attended a graduation ceremony. In such events I often find speeches boring, but this time I was really interested to ear the message that would be delivered to youn managers/entrepreneurs who will need to find their way in the business world in a time of crisis.

Finally I liked the way things were said, wih lucidity. I left with the title of a book I should buy and a very meaningful quotation : “logic without good sense leads to catastroph”.

What’s logic ? It’s what allows to draw certain consequences from established facts, most of times upon an experience based reasoning.

Good sense ? It’s what makes possible for people to realize that something obvious isn’t that obvious, that a good a priori choice will have negative effects, that avoiding complexity isn’t always a good thing. And that, sometimes, logic has its limits.

Logic is reassuring. It puts things into systems, into equations and gives us certainties about what the future will be. It’s consecrated bread for companies. We earned so much this year so if we do the same the same year we’ll earn as much money. A salesperson had such figures this year, so he’ll do at least the same next year. This way of doing things always worked…so it will work again. If an option matches such scoring criterias it will increase our performance…

Good sense tells us logic does not always work. Examples : the 100m world record is improved by 1/10 second every year. Logic tells us one day people will run the 100m in zero seconds and will break the sound barrier. Good sense tells us it’s impossible. Logic tells us a salesperson car improve his performance by 10% a year. Good sense tells us one day he’ll reach a ceiling unless you are ready to  assume one people would be, one day, able to generate the equivalent of French GDP by selling peanuts at the corner of the street.

Logic, when applied to performace, makes us want to brings everything back to a linear function. So companies make promises and built models based on that. Good senses makes us say performance is rather a curve which asymptotic character is often forgotten. It tends with more and more difficulties to something but never reaches it. Do you remember when you studied functions limits in methematics class.

The two functions seem to coincide during a long time, during decades. Sometimes the performance curve can even be better than what’s expected. But the day comes then they cross each other, split. And what happen then ? [Read more...]

A new approach of partnership ?

collaborationI appreciated much a note published by Jeremie Berrebi. He was offering anyone to use Zlio’s technology to build a competitor to is own company. And even to make something better !

Surprising ? Stupid ? Suicidal.

Not at all. It’s pure logic and is the perfect embodiment of a new kind of win / win strategy that may by usefull between people in a company.

My point of view:

Zlio’s strategy 

- using my technlogy you legitimite it

- if  come on my market and communicate, you’re advertising my concept

- if we use the same technical bases, it will be easier in case we merge.

- be worse and I will be a leader, are various (even better) you will give me ideas.

- make this market competitive, we will all take benefits of that.

A real win / win strategy as I said.

But what does it have  to do with managing an  organization ?

Logics of interpersonal partnerships in company

Here are a few behaviors we can identify in nearly every company:

- I do not speak about my projects for fear someones “steal” them to me.
- it’s hard for me to master all aspects of a problematics

- I reinvent the wheel every week

- management never gives me a “GO” to anything I suggets

- if I have a “go” nobody wants to belong to my team

- while speaking with nobody I deprive myself of internal sponsors. I am only one isolated voice whereas if several voices rise the decision makers will become aware of a need for acting. Thus firstly I loose my time  then I does not answer an identified stake.

- I also deprive myself of resources. From where the fact that I often arrive after the battle with a badly tied up project.

- I cannot count on those which worked with another project based on the same idea. They will not help the guy who threw banana skins on their way. If I have the green light impossible thus to gather everyone.

- impossible to know  if somebody thinks about the same thing that me and is more advanced than me.
- considering with final I prefer to only fail by myself that to succeed with others I will never be involved in a major success. Thus good-bye the promotion and I worked in silence for nothing.

One  sees intern competitors  everywhere whereas one should rather try to identify strong sponsors and some partners. The complexity of the current projects as well as the little of time we have impose a true collective agility.