Organization’s networking potential will drive talents

I’ve just read with a real interest this post, about the power of people networks. Top make it short it says that people will be increasingly attracted by regions who offer a strong potential of networking and interactions because it allows them to exploit more their talents and maximise its economic reward.

The author concludes this way ;

I would submit a hypothesis: The capacity of a region for innovation can be measured by the number of formal and informal networking organizations that create “bridging” opportunities across the broadest possible spectrum of society. The richer and denser the skein of bridging networks, the more easily ideas can be communicated through a region, the more spontaneously creative ideas will erupt, and the more speedily people can convert novel notions into business opportunities.

Of course it’s about local development but I think we can transpose it to the enterprise world. That would mean that talents will be more likely to join companies who offer, internally and in the way they interact with their ecosystem, this ability to work as networks, to quickly create value through exchanges and to move quickly from ideas to effective projects.

What say you ?

Do managers have to spend all their time managing interactions ?

images-1.jpegIndeed another way to ask this question would be : “must people be given tools to organize themselves their interactions or is it the manager’s job to control everything”.

In fact you can see both situations in organizations. In some you’ll have few control, tools like wikis or blogs that allow people to communicate and organize themselves in communities of practices, a management based on self responsability, collective intelligence, flexibility, innovation… In others you’ll have…exactly the opposite, that’s to say very directive management, no autonomy (that’s to say no faith in people), strict procedures and now way to communicate and exchange freely.

In both ways the organization is the result of what’s thought being best for performance. So I’m asking what is the role of a manager : develop business, develop people, or mainely manage relations between people. Mainly ? Yes, because if you’re strict on people’s autonomy, you’ll need to hire more and more managers, not to think about business but juste to manage interpersonal relations. [Read more...]

A company is made of people and processes

images-3.jpegWe have to agree that processes have been the priority for a long time, at a point that everyone kows what he has to don how to do it. We don’t know if the individual has developped a belonging feeling toward the company, one thing we’re sure of is that he can’t ignore his a part of a (or several) workflows.

Have we been so far in that direction we would have taken from teams their biggest strenght : being a team and being able to be beter that the sum of individuals which compose it?

It’s a more and more popular idea and, most of all, it is the main point of a McKinsey report which says that the next revolution will concern interactions.

Here is their introduction:

The next revolution in interactions

  • As more 21st-century companies come to specialize in core activities and outsource the rest, they have greater need for workers who can interact with other companies, their customers, and their suppliers.
  • Thus the traditional organization, where a few top managers coordinate the pyramid below them, is being upended.
  • Raising the productivity of employees whose jobs can’t be automated is the next great performance challenge—and the stakes are high.
  • Companies that get it right will build complex talent-based competitive advantages that competitors won’t be able to duplicate easily—if at all.
  • Some things that must be obvious for everyone but that don’t seem to be.

    Hoping more and more managers will be aware of that…