Social Medias : being there, doing as usual, doing new things

Everyday we receive new numbers that show that an always increasing number of  people are “on” an increasing number of social networks, that such percentage of an age class is there, that such country is more represented than another or is slowly bridging the gap with the others etc…

Hence the unavoidable conclusion : almost everybody is comfortable with the social logic and the tools that come with and, logically, everybody will be comfortable to use them in the workplace and even ask for them.

A first reflection about the number of users. If we differenciate the number of registered people from the number of active users, the numbers dramatically drop, as we recently sauw with twitter. If I had to sum the number of services where I have an account I oppened just to try or to be findable whenever someone looks for me, the number of services I actually use may be less than 10%. If I consider the average user who finally accepted an invitation because he was fed up with receiving tens or hundreds of invitations from his friends to join the last trendy platform…and who forgot both is password and the fact he had an account there…

What matters when it comes to assess the wealth of social medias is not the number of users but what they actually do (provided they do anything). So let’s focus on those who are really active.

Consider Facebook for instance. Look at the most common usage. Say what you’re doing, what you’re thinging. Share a joke. Share something you’ve seen elsewhere on the web. Does it remind you of something ? It’s exactly what we used to do with emails in the late 90s. Today, instead of sending a joke or a video to our whole address book by email why share it one Facebook. We also play on Facebook. In the 2000s, games were standalone services. We used to play and invite friends to the game… Now everything happens in the same environment. As for really new usages, some are very interesting but only concern a little minority of users.

Now, let’s consider more business oriented social networks, like linkedIn. Many are “on”, use them to push their applications when they are looking for a job (sometimes in a clumsy way without understanding that networks work differently than conventional ways), to push their product when they have something to sell. Some participate in groups, but not everybody. Some use the social filter to qualify their contacts…but a few people really do that.

There is a big difference between being on a social network and using it. Then, there is a difference that is at least as big between using them to make things “as usual” and using them to do new things or old things in a new way.

Now, let’s have a look at the workplace… [Read more...]

Enterprise 2.0′s weakness ? Decision

Let’s assume that, through a mix a community management and socio-collaborative management, businesses manage to make information and people for identifiable and accessible in order to facilitate and accelerate workaday execution, solve problems and invent tomorow’s products and operating models. Even if that sounds seducing, there’s something wrong in the reasonning.

All these dynamics and informations don’t create any value by themselves. That’s one of the reasons why, even if the value of such things is admitted by nearly everybody, there’s still something in decision-maker’s heads that prevent them from seing the tangible value behind.

All these things, this informal, organizational, human capital etc.. create nothing but a potential. A hudge potential though, but only a potential. This brings us back to what I wrote about strategy maps. All this things does not bring anything if not reused in structured and formalized operations. There are some ways to do so :

Social routine that brings information reuse on the flow.

• Decision : that makes possible that something new is used or started.

I’d like to focus on this last point. [Read more...]

Change…but not everything at once

There’s one common question with no absolute answer : “ok, since I decided to implement social software within my company, how do I have to do ?”. I think most of the experts will agree there’s no magic recipe but many tips you have to adapt to your own context.

But, before all, never forget the rule number one : before ask how, first ask why. It will help you to choose the right tools (because “social software” means a very broad choice of tools) for the right purposes. Then, imagine the practices and usages uou want to happen, the starting point and the finish line because the best way to achieve something is to fully visualize it.

In the following paragraph I’ll use generic words practices and tools in their 1.0 and 2.0 version, even if it may be simplistic.

Tools 1.0 : all the classic and legacy tools companies have been using so far.

Tools 2.0 : social networks, blogs, wikis, social bookmarking….

Practices 1.0 : current practices, mainly top down, in a “hub approach“, relying on corporate’s formal structures and neglecting the informal one.

Practices 2.0 : about free-form collaboration, cross organizaton interactions. They’re not to replace the previous ones but to add to them.

The purpose is to start from practices 1.0 on tools 2.0 to practices 2.0 on tools 2.0. To be more precise, it’s about keeping the 1.0/1.0 duet for activities it’s perfectly adapted to, move some 1.0 practices on 2.0 tools for more efficiency and make it possible to develop new 2.0 on 2.0 tools.

Expercience teaches us that moving directly from 1.0/1.0 to 2.0/2.0 is very hard for many reasons.

[Read more...]

Do french companies really understand nothing to web 2.0 ?

A recent Jemm Research survey made upon IBM request [fr] shows that french companies can’t identify web 2.0 tools and their benefits. Do we have to worry about that ?

According to me the way things are asked introduces a bias in the answer, most of because they took the issue wrong side up. What are the benefits of social networks, blogs, wikis, in a top-down organization, where whitholding information means power, and where a taylorian work model applied to activities that are not made for it make people not waste time to help others ? A first sight : None !

In the other hand, if we think about working differently in order to maximize the use of knowledge, expertise, if we don’t want to spend thousands hours to reinvent the weel, then tools make sense.

In short, if people are asked what they think of new tools since they are formated to work and see things through an old paradigm, the answer is obvious. If they were asked “wouldn’t it be more efficient to work this way ?….and in this case are those tools relevant ?”, perhaps the answer wouldn’t have been the same. [Read more...]