Giving problem solving a framework

Since today collaboration means solving problems together, it’s important companies provide their employees with a problem solving framework.

Why not a methodology or a process ?

In fact both are needed but the most important lack is about the framework.

There are high level issues where problem solving needs a strong methodology, a dedicated taskforce (that’s what I saw I Bell Canada for example). What doesn’t prelude crowdsourcing.

In the other hand, in people’s day to day job, it not necessary to build and heavy and expensive system, but to provide people with a framework which will make it possible for people to find by themselves.

The notion of framework is very important because since what people have to solve wasn’t predictable (if it was it wouldn’t have happen…), and if we want people to use a methodology (or even serendipity), the first thing to do is to make it possible, and provide them with what’s necessary : raw materials, tools and methodoly. And the possibility to use them !

[Read more...]

Creating a corporate memory is about telling stories

I really believe conversations are key to capturing tacit knowledge, best practices,  all those things that are parts of the individual’s patrimony and can only be captured an harnessed by stimulating individual memories through conversations, since they are the most accessible form of knowledge.

Hence the necessity to provide the organization with tools that make those open discussions and their stimulation possible, just as their capitalization.

Most often, when I talk about conversations it’s about best practices, knowledge transfer, everything that can suport the business function and I think there’s nothing more to say on this point, but this note from Scott Monty made me think of another dimension that would really fit with the idea of “corporate memories”, going beyond pure business to adress corporate culture purposes. [Read more...]