Gartner’s Hype Cycle has become a kind of law of gravity in the world of technology. Each technology follows a well-defined path: collective excitement, disillusionment, then gradual stabilization. It’s a narrative so well-established that it ends up resembling a self-fulfilling prophecy.
But should we just accept it? Is it a necessary step, or can we break free from it and, ideally, reach that famous “plateau of productivity” quickly without wasting too much time and money on the preliminary phases?
In short:
- Gartner’s Hype Cycle reflects the psychological dynamics surrounding a technology rather than its intrinsic value, illustrating the phases of enthusiasm, disillusionment, and stabilization.
- Breaking free from the Hype Cycle means distinguishing real innovation from media hype, favoring experimentation and experience over euphoria.
- Reaching the “plateau of productivity” depends primarily on organizational maturity, i.e., the ability to integrate technology in a structured way, rather than passively following it.
- The pace of technology adoption should be aligned with the organization’s internal capabilities, not with trends dictated by the market or analysts.
- Redefining your own technology maturity cycle is based on an approach founded on usage, measurement, and learning, freeing yourself from the logic imposed by the dominant discourse.
The cycle is not inevitable but a mirror
The Hype Cycle does not measure the value of a technology but the psychology of its environment. The peak of expectations corresponds to an inflation of promises often disconnected from any real use, and the ensuing collapse punishes less the technology than the disillusionment of those who had projected disproportionate expectations onto it. This is a topic that will undoubtedly come up again with AI, not to explain why it didn’t work, but why it didn’t work as well as we had dreamed, and once again, we will put technology on trial instead of our own naivety (AGI, employment, productivity: the great bluff of AI predictions).
Breaking free from this cycle means not confusing innovation with agitation. This does not mean being suspicious of everything, but rather building your approach on experience rather than enthusiasm.
The acceleration toward the plateau is organizational
Many dream of a shortcut to the productivity plateau, but this plateau is not a natural stage that can simply be waited for or forced, but rather a construction. It is reached when technology ceases to be a subject in itself and becomes a controlled means to an end (Technology is a word that describes something that doesn’t work yet (Douglas Adams)).
This transition does not depend on the market or analysts, but on the internal capacity to absorb innovation. The businesses that achieve this the fastest are not necessarily the most technologically daring, but often the most organizationally mature.
They are characterized by a governance that allows experimentation without immediately demanding a quantifiable return, a culture that learns quickly from its mistakes, and decision-making processes that prioritize practical value rather than blindly following the latest trends.
In other words, the advantage lies not in technology itself, but in the ability to digest it.
Don’t confuse technological pace with human pace
The trap of the Hype Cycle is that it imposes an external tempo. It leads us to believe that there is a “right moment” for each technology, and that we must jump on the bandwagon or risk missing the boat, when in fact the right pace is not that of the market but that of the organization.
Some organizations adopt early and stabilize quickly, while others observe, test, and only deploy once they have found the right fit with their processes, business lines, and uses. In both cases, the key is consistency between the speed of adoption and the capacity for integration.
In fact, you can’t escape the Hype Cycle by trying to move faster than it, as if rushing would prevent disillusionment, but by refusing to base your decisions on the media agenda or analysts’ projections. From there, a business can build its own maturity cycle, based on experimentation, measurement, and feedback—in short, on the tangible rather than on promises.
Bottom Line
The Hype Cycle will not disappear and will continue to influence discourse, guide budgets, and serve as a guiding thread for forums and conferences, but we can choose not to be prisoners to it.
The challenge is not to stand outside the movement, but to learn to move forward at your own pace. We cannot shorten the cycle by removing steps, but we can try to redefine it.
To answer your questions…
No. The Hype Cycle does not describe the value of a technology, but rather the market’s reaction to it. The peak of expectations and the subsequent disillusionment mainly reflect exaggerated projections. To break free from this, you need to distinguish between innovation and fads, and move forward based on your experience rather than trends.
This plateau is being built, it is not just waiting to happen. Businesses are achieving it through a culture of learning, governance that is open to experimentation, and evaluation based on utility value rather than hype. It is organizational maturity, rather than technological speed, that makes the difference.
Enthusiasm for something new often leads to premature adoption, without any real need. True innovation is based on experimentation, measurement, and gradual integration. Hype, on the other hand, follows the trend without any clear strategy.
A culture that embraces trial and error promotes healthier and more sustainable adoption. Businesses that learn quickly and evaluate pragmatically absorb innovation better than those that are guided by trends.
By setting its own pace of adoption. The challenge is not to move faster than the market, but to make decisions based on its capabilities and objectives. The business gains maturity when it prioritizes experimentation and consistency rather than rushing to embrace novelty.
Image credit: Image generated by artificial intelligence via ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Related articles:
Metaverse: where do we stand 5 years later?
Technology is a word that describes something that doesn’t work yet (Douglas Adams)
Where are the budgets of digital transformation going ?
The limits of technology-driven transformation
The end of Google Wave : both something logical and a half-truth
Employement : a (lost ?) war against the machine ?
